34.6 C
Thursday, May 13, 2021

Panel head ‘linking’ Char Dham mission to floods baseless: Govt | India Information – Occasions of India

Must read

NEW DELHI: The Centre on Wednesday trashed Supreme Court docket-appointed excessive powered committee chairman Ravi Chopra’s makes an attempt to hyperlink the current flash floods in Uttarakhand to the widening of roads for the Char Dham mission in an eco-fragile zone and informed the courtroom that it was a “unilateral” expression of “baseless and unwarranted” views.
In its December 31 report back to the SC, 16 members of the HPC had authorized the Char Dham mission and widening of roads as much as 10 metres. Nevertheless, chairman Chopra and two others opposed widening of roads past a width of 5.5 metres. In its January 15 affidavit, the Centre had termed Chopra’s views as “private” and “bereft of a holistic strategy” which required conserving in thoughts the requirement of the armed forces to maneuver troops quick, particularly in view of the standoff on the India-China border.
Lawyer basic Ok Ok Venugopal and solicitor basic Tushar Mehta on Wednesday knowledgeable a bench of Justices R F Nariman, Hemant Gupta and Bhushan R Gavai about Chopra’s February 13 letter. “Yesterday we acquired a letter from the chairman of the HPC, written on his personal and linking the current catastrophe to the Char Dham mission. In keeping with the defence ministry, the chairman’s observations within the letter are baseless and unwarranted. There is no such thing as a hyperlink in any respect between the catastrophe and the mission,” the AG stated.
The bench accepted the AG’s request for 2 weeks to reply to the letter., wherein Chopra stated, “I’m compelled to put in writing this letter to the Supreme Court in gentle of the current catastrophe in Uttarakhand’s Char Dham area. Two dams had been destroyed within the Rishiganga and Dhauliganga (west) river valleys, earlier than the flood waters entered the Alaknanda valley beneath NH 58 (the Rishikesh-Badrinath freeway) and swept away one other suspension bridge. Thirty-six our bodies have been recovered to date and over 170 individuals are reportedly lacking.”
After the 2013 Kedarnath catastrophe attributable to a cloudburst, the SC-appointed professional physique headed by Chopra gave a report in April 2014 to the courtroom on the catastrophe potential of hydroelectric initiatives on the Alaknanda river. The EB report had highlighted the potential menace of paraglacial zones and emphasised that they had been disasterprone areas. The EB had really helpful that hydro-electric initiatives not be in-built these valleys.
Chopra stated if the 2014 suggestions within the EB report had been adopted, huge lack of lives and property may have been prevented within the Rishiganga and Tapovan Vishnugad initiatives. “Sadly, all under-construction initiatives continued their development unhindered. Now, final Sunday’s tragic catastrophe has confirmed our fears and warnings,” he added.
Referring to the report submitted by three members of the HPC, together with himself, on December 31, Chopra stated, “It’s strongly argued that catastrophe resilience is extra crucial than merely widening highways. Slope stabilisation works to date have been most insufficient as evident from frequent failures and highway closures. Extreme treefelling, indiscriminate disposal of highway development and landslide particles have endangered downhill slopes and polluted rivers.”
In its January affidavit, the Centre had trashed the minority report and informed the SC, “The bulk report has taken a holistic view of the matter conserving in thoughts the social, financial and strategic wants of the nation on the one hand and defending the setting on the opposite.”

Source link

More articles


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest article

%d bloggers like this: