MUMBAI: Dnyandev Wankhede, father of NCB‘s zonal director Sameer Wankhede, on Wednesday approached the Bombay Excessive Court docket difficult its single-judge bench order that had refused to restrain Maharashtra minister Nawab Malik from making feedback and placing social media posts in opposition to the anti-drug company officer and his household.
Dnyandev Wankhede talked about for pressing listening to his enchantment difficult the one bench order and urged a division bench of Justices S J Kathawalla and Milind Jadhav to grant him aid.
His enchantment is prone to be heard by the division bench on Thursday.
On Monday, a single-judge bench of Justice Madhav Jamdar had refused to grant Wankhede any interim aid in his defamation go well with filed in opposition to Malik, a frontrunner of Maharashtra’s ruling social gathering NCP.
Wankhede had cited Malik’s tweets and public statements, whereby the latter had alleged amongst different issues, that Sameer Wankhede had been born a Muslim, however had falsely claimed that he belonged to a chosen Scheduled Caste (SC) to safe a central authorities job.
He had sought as interim aid that Malik be prohibited from making any defamatory statements or tweets, social media posts, and so on, in opposition to him, Sameer Wankhede, or any of their members of the family.
Justice Jamdar, nevertheless, had held that imposing such a blanket prohibition upon Malik was not attainable within the current case.
The only bench had held that although it appeared obvious that Malik’s statements and tweets in opposition to the NCB officer had actuated out of malice and animosity, the allegations the minister had made in opposition to Sameer Wankhede didn’t appear prima facie (on the face of it) to be utterly false.
The only bench, nevertheless, had directed Malik to henceforth make public statements or feedback in opposition to Wankhede and his household solely after cheap verification of information.
In his enchantment talked about earlier than the division bench, Dnyandev Wankhede contended that because the single bench had held that Malik’s allegations in opposition to Sameer Wankhede had stemmed out of malice, the minister ought to have been restrained from making additional defamatory feedback in opposition to him and his household.

Source link

Leave a Reply